Organisations must be equipped to respond to new vulnerabilities and shifting business requirements without compromising security. One of the key elements of this adaptability is Secure by Design Principle 6 “Implement Flexible Architectures”.
By building systems that can integrate new security controls seamlessly, organisations can maintain agility while safeguarding their infrastructure.
The Need for Flexibility in Modern Cyber Security
Legacy systems, designed with rigid architectures, often struggle to keep pace with these changes. This lack of adaptability increases the likelihood of security gaps, making organisations more vulnerable to breaches.
Flexible architectures, on the other hand, allow for easier integration of new controls, enabling organisations to adapt in real-time. Whether it’s updating software, deploying patches, or introducing new defensive measures, these architectures offer an enhanced ability to respond without disruption.
Key Benefits of Flexible Architectures
- Changes Made Without Compromising Security
Flexible systems allow organisations to implement necessary updates and changes without reducing security measures. By designing with modularity in mind, new components can be integrated or replaced seamlessly, ensuring that security controls remain intact and effective throughout the process. - Faster Response to Evolving Cyber Threats
The ability to quickly deploy defensive measures is crucial. Organisations that employ adaptable systems can respond swiftly, patching vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. This rapid response minimises potential damage and ensures continued protection.
Case Study: NHS and the 2017 WannaCry Ransomware Attack
In May 2017, the NHS suffered a crippling ransomware attack when the WannaCry virus infected its systems, encrypting data and demanding a ransom to restore access.
The NHS was particularly susceptible to the attack due to its reliance on legacy systems running outdated versions of Windows, which had not been updated or patched. WannaCry exploited a vulnerability in Windows systems for which Microsoft had issued a patch two months prior to the attack. However, because many NHS computers ran older versions of Windows, including unsupported systems like Windows XP, they were unable to receive the necessary updates automatically.
These legacy systems were challenging to upgrade and secure, creating barriers to maintaining basic cyber hygiene, such as timely patching. Additionally, the NHS’s infrastructure lacked the flexibility needed to implement rapid defensive measures and updates, leaving the organisation unprepared to respond to the ransomware quickly.
Conclusion
As cyber threats become more sophisticated, the ability to respond with speed and efficiency will continue to be a priority. Flexible architectures are no longer optional—they are essential for staying ahead of the curve. By designing systems that can evolve with the business and the threat landscape, organisations can ensure that they remain resilient, regardless of the challenges ahead.
Image by freepik